🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.